🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, campaigners, and parents are observing intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing number of countries are considering parallel bans.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that phones and platforms are "stealing our kids' youth". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "an measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to pass a bill lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended families to block their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is provided. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the step does not establish binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a good foundation," stated the MEP supporting the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by conclusive research".

Earlier, interest grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. An organization founded by the family of a teenager who died after viewing disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban may not protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to create tools that are safe and fit for children," said a leading online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, action is largely occurring at the state level amid national stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law capping minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra access needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted laws mandating parental consent for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain figures to copy this example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Beyond the West, further countries are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations take a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The body highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve user protection.

As this international debate evolves, the actions of this nation and its followers demonstrate that states internationally are no longer content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.